highest frequency of species, while Serranidae
(10%), Carangidae (8%) and Gobiidae (5%) are the
most frequent families.
Regarding their ecological distribution, the
species occur in 29 habitats, with 124 species
(40.3%) associated with rocky bottoms and 53
(17.2%) with sandy bottoms, with only 14 (4.5%)
restricted to coral formations themselves; however,
even these species are not exclusive to reef
environments, also occurring in other habitats.
Regarding the geographic distribution on
the Brazilian coast (including continental and
oceanic islands), there are 2,981 records of
occurrence in 700 locations, with Trachurus
lathami (83), Diplectrum radiale (73) and
Ogcocephalus vespertilio (69) being the species
with the highest number of records.
There are 3,134 nucleotide sequences and
2,748 protein sequences in the database for 211
species (60.5% of the total), of which 89 have more
than 40 sequences and the others between 2 and 39
sequences.
Regarding the conservation status, 1
species (Epinephelus itajara) is in the Critically
Endangered (CR) category, 2 species (Epinephelus
marginatus and Scarus trispinosus) are in the
Endangered (EN) category, 8 species
(Hippocampus erectus, Hyporthodus niveatus,
Mycteroperca interstitialis, Lutjanus analis, L.
cyanopterus, Enneanectes smithi, Coryphopterus
thrix and Balistes capriscus) are in the Vulnerable
(VU) category, with 243 species in the Least
Concern (LC) category, 9 in the Data Deficient
(DD) category, and 39 in the Not Evaluated (NE)
category, according to the IUCN criteria. No
species was listed as Near Threatened (NT),
Extinct in the Wild (EW) or Extinct (EX)
categories.
Conclusions
The main result of the project was the
development and publication of a database on the
biodiversity of ichthyofauna associated with reef
formations along the Brazilian coast. To our
knowledge, this database is, to date, the only
initiative of its kind implemented in the world,
aiming to consolidate in an integrated database the
information available on this ichthyofauna in
Brazil. In addition, the modular and open
framework used for the implementation of the
database can be used in the development of
biodiversity databases for other taxonomic groups
and geographic regions.
Acknowledgements
We thank Luís Geraldes Primeiro and
Valéria Gallo for their review of the manuscript.
References
Bisby, F. A. 2000. The quiet revolution:
biodiversity informatics and the internet.
Science 289: 2309-2312.
Briggs, J. C. 1974. Marine zoogeography. New
York: McGraw-Hill.
Cavalcanti, M. J. 2023. ACACIA: a generic
conceptual schema for taxonomic databases.
Tropical Diversity 3: 1-6.
Ekman, S. 1953. Zoogeography of the sea. London:
Sidgwick & Jackson.
Floeter, S. R. & Gasparini, J. L. 2000. The
southwestern Atlantic reef fish fauna:
composition and zoogeographic patterns.
Journal of Fish Biology 56: 1099-1114.
Floeter, S. R., Gasparini, J. L., Rocha, L. A.,
Ferreira, C. E. L., Rangel, C. A. & Feitoza, B.